<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
    </head>
    <body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:hans@chromium.org" title="Hans Wennborg <hans@chromium.org>"> <span class="fn">Hans Wennborg</span></a>
</span> changed
          <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - Merge r324195 into the 6.0 branch: [LV] Use Demanded Bits and ValueTracking for reduction type-shrinking"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36321">bug 36321</a>
          <br>
             <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
          <tr>
            <th>What</th>
            <th>Removed</th>
            <th>Added</th>
          </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
           <td>NEW
           </td>
           <td>RESOLVED
           </td>
         </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
           <td>---
           </td>
           <td>FIXED
           </td>
         </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - Merge r324195 into the 6.0 branch: [LV] Use Demanded Bits and ValueTracking for reduction type-shrinking"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36321#c7">Comment # 7</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - Merge r324195 into the 6.0 branch: [LV] Use Demanded Bits and ValueTracking for reduction type-shrinking"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36321">bug 36321</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:hans@chromium.org" title="Hans Wennborg <hans@chromium.org>"> <span class="fn">Hans Wennborg</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre>(In reply to Chad Rosier from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=36321#c6">comment #6</a>)
<span class="quote">> Following up on Michael's comments.. the bug was filed in Dec '17, but the
> code that introduced the bug was committed in Aug. '15 (at least based on
> the comments in PR35734), so this doesn't look to be a 5.0 regression.

> I agree this is a non-trivial change.  I'll let Hans decide if this should
> be included in 6.0.0 or 6.0.1.</span >

It's been very quiet since this landed on trunk, so I went ahead and merged it
in 
 r325508.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>


      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>