<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:hans@chromium.org" title="Hans Wennborg <hans@chromium.org>"> <span class="fn">Hans Wennborg</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED FIXED - ms_abi is implemented incorrectly for larger values (>=16 bytes)"
href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31362">bug 31362</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
<td>NEW
</td>
<td>RESOLVED
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
<td>---
</td>
<td>FIXED
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED FIXED - ms_abi is implemented incorrectly for larger values (>=16 bytes)"
href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31362#c9">Comment # 9</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED FIXED - ms_abi is implemented incorrectly for larger values (>=16 bytes)"
href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31362">bug 31362</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:hans@chromium.org" title="Hans Wennborg <hans@chromium.org>"> <span class="fn">Hans Wennborg</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Dimitry Andric from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=31362#c8">comment #8</a>)
<span class="quote">> There's now a fix landed in <a href="https://reviews.llvm.org/rL324594">https://reviews.llvm.org/rL324594</a>, it at least
> fixes the assertion from <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - After r316416, Assertion failed: ((size_t)StackDisp < Context.MovVector.size() && "Function call has more parameters than the stack is adjusted for."), function collectCallInfo, file lib/Target/X86/X86CallFrameOptimization.c"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=35814">bug 35814</a>, but can the original submitter of this
> bug also please independently verify that it fixes their issue?
>
> We should merge this as soon as it has baked a little in trunk, Hans, do you
> agree?</span >
Sounds good to me. Merged in r324718.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>