<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
    </head>
    <body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:hans@chromium.org" title="Hans Wennborg <hans@chromium.org>"> <span class="fn">Hans Wennborg</span></a>
</span> changed
          <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - Merge r322016 into the 6.0 branch"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36082">bug 36082</a>
          <br>
             <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
          <tr>
            <th>What</th>
            <th>Removed</th>
            <th>Added</th>
          </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
           <td>---
           </td>
           <td>FIXED
           </td>
         </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
           <td>NEW
           </td>
           <td>RESOLVED
           </td>
         </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - Merge r322016 into the 6.0 branch"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36082#c3">Comment # 3</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - Merge r322016 into the 6.0 branch"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36082">bug 36082</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:hans@chromium.org" title="Hans Wennborg <hans@chromium.org>"> <span class="fn">Hans Wennborg</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre>(In reply to Sanjay Patel from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=36082#c2">comment #2</a>)
<span class="quote">> Yes, r322016 should be merged as that's a clear fix for the bug.</span >

Merged in r323738.

<span class="quote">> No, r322006 should not be merged.

> Based on the post-commit comments in:
> <a href="https://reviews.llvm.org/D41812">https://reviews.llvm.org/D41812</a>

> r322006 needs changes for correctness, so it's not suitable for the branch
> yet. It may get or already be reverted from trunk based on a mailing list
> comment.</span >

Sounds like it was pretty much backed out in r323630.

<span class="quote">> If you merge:
> <a href="https://reviews.llvm.org/rL323331">https://reviews.llvm.org/rL323331</a>
> then you should not hit <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - clang crashes running pass -correlated-propagation"
   href="show_bug.cgi?id=35807">bug 35807</a> which is what r322006 was also solving.

> Note that merging r323331 is tracked by <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - clang crashes on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu while running pass 'Simplify the CFG'"
   href="show_bug.cgi?id=36045">bug 36045</a>.</span >

That was merged.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>


      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>