<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
    </head>
    <body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
        <tr>
          <th>Bug ID</th>
          <td><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW - False positive / hidden assumption on separate tests of static variable"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36023">36023</a>
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Summary</th>
          <td>False positive / hidden assumption on separate tests of static variable
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Product</th>
          <td>clang
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Version</th>
          <td>5.0
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Hardware</th>
          <td>PC
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>OS</th>
          <td>Linux
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Status</th>
          <td>NEW
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Severity</th>
          <td>enhancement
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Priority</th>
          <td>P
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Component</th>
          <td>Static Analyzer
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Assignee</th>
          <td>dcoughlin@apple.com
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Reporter</th>
          <td>achurch+llvm@achurch.org
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>CC</th>
          <td>llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
          </td>
        </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
        <pre>scan-build (clang 5.0.1) reports a null dereference at the marked line in this
code:

---------------- test.c ----------------
static int n = 1;
extern void bar(void);
void foo(void)
{
    int *p;
    if (n > 0) {
        p = &n;
    } else {
        p = 0;
    }
    bar();
    for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
        *p += i;  // False positive assuming n is not externally modified.
    }
}
----------------------------------------

If n is declared locally in foo() (whether static or not) or if I remove the
bar() call, the error is not reported, which makes me think that the analyzer
is assuming bar() could modify the value of n.  However, clearly the address of
n can never escape this file, so at least in this case the assumption is
clearly unwarranted.  Even if the file was sufficiently complex that the
analyzer couldn't make that determination, I think it would be sensible to have
the analyzer explicitly state the assumption that bar() is modifying the value
of n in its report, because otherwise it just looks like an analyzer bug.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>


      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>