<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
    </head>
    <body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:llvm-dev@redking.me.uk" title="Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev@redking.me.uk>"> <span class="fn">Simon Pilgrim</span></a>
</span> changed
          <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - pushf/popf default to wrong operand size in 64-bit with Intel syntax"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32035">bug 32035</a>
          <br>
             <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
          <tr>
            <th>What</th>
            <th>Removed</th>
            <th>Added</th>
          </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
           <td>NEW
           </td>
           <td>RESOLVED
           </td>
         </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">See Also</td>
           <td>
                
           </td>
           <td>https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35847
           </td>
         </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
           <td>---
           </td>
           <td>FIXED
           </td>
         </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - pushf/popf default to wrong operand size in 64-bit with Intel syntax"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32035#c7">Comment # 7</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - pushf/popf default to wrong operand size in 64-bit with Intel syntax"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32035">bug 32035</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:llvm-dev@redking.me.uk" title="Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev@redking.me.uk>"> <span class="fn">Simon Pilgrim</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre>Resolving original bug.

(In reply to Coby Tayree from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=32035#c5">comment #5</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to Vicente Bergas from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=32035#c3">comment #3</a>)

> This one seems as independent issue.
> Both clang & GCC will fall if the call to printf is omitted.
> assembly difference lays in GCC's epilogue code for the encapsulating
> function - it uses the 'leave' instruction and bypassing the stack's
> dis-alignment.</span >

Split this off to <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW - pushf/popw out of sync stack"
   href="show_bug.cgi?id=35847">Bug #35847</a></pre>
        </div>
      </p>


      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>