<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
    </head>
    <body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk" title="Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">Richard Smith</span></a>
</span> changed
          <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED INVALID - noexcept should check whether the expression is a constant expression"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15481">bug 15481</a>
          <br>
             <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
          <tr>
            <th>What</th>
            <th>Removed</th>
            <th>Added</th>
          </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
           <td>NEW
           </td>
           <td>RESOLVED
           </td>
         </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
           <td>---
           </td>
           <td>INVALID
           </td>
         </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED INVALID - noexcept should check whether the expression is a constant expression"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15481#c5">Comment # 5</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED INVALID - noexcept should check whether the expression is a constant expression"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15481">bug 15481</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk" title="Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">Richard Smith</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre>Conclusion from CWG discussion: we're going to keep this as-is. "noexcept" has
no special rule for constant expressions.

It turns out this is actually essential for proper library functionality: eg,
if noexcept tries evaluating its operand, then (for example)
is_nothrow_swappable is broken by making std::swap constexpr, because
std::swap<T> then often ends up getting instantiated before T is complete.

As a result of that, I'm also going to consider this change as an effective DR
against C++11 and C++14... but I'm open to reconsidering if we see many user
complaints.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>


      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>