<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
    </head>
    <body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk" title="Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">Richard Smith</span></a>
</span> changed
          <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED INVALID - Differences in function type handling compared with gcc?"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33874">bug 33874</a>
          <br>
             <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
          <tr>
            <th>What</th>
            <th>Removed</th>
            <th>Added</th>
          </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
           <td>NEW
           </td>
           <td>RESOLVED
           </td>
         </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
           <td>---
           </td>
           <td>INVALID
           </td>
         </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">CC</td>
           <td>
                
           </td>
           <td>richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk
           </td>
         </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED INVALID - Differences in function type handling compared with gcc?"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33874#c1">Comment # 1</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED INVALID - Differences in function type handling compared with gcc?"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33874">bug 33874</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk" title="Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">Richard Smith</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre>This is a GCC bug. See [expr.prim.lambda.capture]/10.2:

"For each entity captured by copy, an unnamed non-static data member is
declared in the closure type. The declaration order of these members is
unspecified. The type of such a data member is the referenced type if the
entity is a reference to an object, an lvalue reference to the referenced
function type if the entity is a reference to a function, or the type of the
corresponding captured entity otherwise."

The type of the implicitly declared capture for "e" within the lambda closure
type is 'void (&)()', not 'void ()'.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>


      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>