<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:llvm-dev@redking.me.uk" title="Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev@redking.me.uk>"> <span class="fn">Simon Pilgrim</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - clang crashes on valid code at -O1 and above: Assertion `(I.atEnd() || std::next(I) == def_instr_end()) && "getVRegDef assumes a single definition or no definition"' failed"
href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34634">bug 34634</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
<td>FIXED
</td>
<td>DUPLICATE
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - clang crashes on valid code at -O1 and above: Assertion `(I.atEnd() || std::next(I) == def_instr_end()) && "getVRegDef assumes a single definition or no definition"' failed"
href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34634#c5">Comment # 5</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - clang crashes on valid code at -O1 and above: Assertion `(I.atEnd() || std::next(I) == def_instr_end()) && "getVRegDef assumes a single definition or no definition"' failed"
href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34634">bug 34634</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:llvm-dev@redking.me.uk" title="Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev@redking.me.uk>"> <span class="fn">Simon Pilgrim</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Zhendong Su from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=34634#c4">comment #4</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to Davide Italiano from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=34634#c1">comment #1</a>)
> > I think I've seen a commit reverted recently that could be have been
> > responsible. Zhendong, if you're not on ToT, can you try upgrading and see
> > if that still reproduces? If so, I'll take a look
>
> It doesn't reproduce anymore with trunk rev. 313398.</span >
The LEA patch committed in rL313343 was reverted in rL313376
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - New assertion: "getVRegDef assumes a single definition or no definition" after r313343"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=34629">bug 34629</a> ***</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>