<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
</head>
<body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>Bug ID</th>
<td><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - source-based code coverage shows coverage for constants defined with #define"
href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34059">34059</a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Summary</th>
<td>source-based code coverage shows coverage for constants defined with #define
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Product</th>
<td>new-bugs
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Version</th>
<td>unspecified
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Hardware</th>
<td>PC
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>OS</th>
<td>Windows NT
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Status</th>
<td>NEW
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Severity</th>
<td>enhancement
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Priority</th>
<td>P
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Component</th>
<td>new bugs
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Assignee</th>
<td>unassignedbugs@nondot.org
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Reporter</th>
<td>efriedma@codeaurora.org
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>CC</th>
<td>llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org, vsk@apple.com
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<pre>Consider the following:
#define VAL -1
int f(void) {
return VAL;
}
If you generate a coverage report, we show coverage for the code in f()... and
we also show coverage for "-1". I guess that's correct, in some sense, but it
isn't really useful; the user thinks of it as a constant, not code.
On its own, this doesn't matter much. But it gets annoying when you generate a
coverage report for a C codebase: the report includes a bunch of headers which
don't contain any code.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>