<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
    </head>
    <body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:rafael.espindola@gmail.com" title="Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <rafael.espindola@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Rafael Ávila de Espíndola</span></a>
</span> changed
          <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - Regression with Musl after adding support for outputting to /dev/null"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32425">bug 32425</a>
          <br>
             <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
          <tr>
            <th>What</th>
            <th>Removed</th>
            <th>Added</th>
          </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
           <td>REOPENED
           </td>
           <td>RESOLVED
           </td>
         </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
           <td>---
           </td>
           <td>FIXED
           </td>
         </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - Regression with Musl after adding support for outputting to /dev/null"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32425#c15">Comment # 15</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - Regression with Musl after adding support for outputting to /dev/null"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32425">bug 32425</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:rafael.espindola@gmail.com" title="Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <rafael.espindola@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Rafael Ávila de Espíndola</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre>(In reply to Rich Felker from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=32425#c14">comment #14</a>)
<span class="quote">> Even with the correct interpretation (semantic, not implementation-detail)
> protected still admits efficient calls inside a DSO -- there's no reason to
> make calls through the PLT, only expressions that evaluate the address have
> to take the [PLT]GOT entry into account.</span >

And ABIs don't define which relocations are allowed only on calls.

Please stop reopening this. If you want to make a case for allowing protected
symbols to be preempted discuss that on generic-abic.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>


      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>