<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
    </head>
    <body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:hans@chromium.org" title="Hans Wennborg <hans@chromium.org>"> <span class="fn">Hans Wennborg</span></a>
</span> changed
          <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - wrong code with "opt -loop-rotate -licm -loop-unroll""
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31187">bug 31187</a>
          <br>
             <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
          <tr>
            <th>What</th>
            <th>Removed</th>
            <th>Added</th>
          </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
           <td>NEW
           </td>
           <td>RESOLVED
           </td>
         </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
           <td>---
           </td>
           <td>FIXED
           </td>
         </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - wrong code with "opt -loop-rotate -licm -loop-unroll""
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31187#c10">Comment # 10</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - wrong code with "opt -loop-rotate -licm -loop-unroll""
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31187">bug 31187</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:hans@chromium.org" title="Hans Wennborg <hans@chromium.org>"> <span class="fn">Hans Wennborg</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre>(In reply to Chandler Carruth from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=31187#c9">comment #9</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to Hans Wennborg from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=31187#c7">comment #7</a>)
> > Chandler, do you know what would cause the test case to assert when your
> > patch is merged to 4.0?

> Yes, the issue is that you're adding testing for LICM in the new PM which
> hits several asserts specific to the new PM.

> To make this test reasonable I think you'd need at least r292241 and
> r292709, but this is well outside of "safe" patches to port and I don't know
> how many others would be needed.

> I think you should just drop the test from the branch -- the new PM's loop
> pass support just isn't complete enough for it to make sense to test heavily
> or expect to work well when tested.</span >

Thanks! Merged without the test in r295748.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>


      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>