<html>
<head>
<base href="https://llvm.org/bugs/" />
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:frankhb1989@gmail.com" title="frankhb1989@gmail.com">frankhb1989@gmail.com</a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED --- - Inherited constructor with dependent base class introduced by a typedef-name may not work"
href="https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27504">bug 27504</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
<td>RESOLVED
</td>
<td>REOPENED
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
<td>INVALID
</td>
<td>---
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED --- - Inherited constructor with dependent base class introduced by a typedef-name may not work"
href="https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27504#c2">Comment # 2</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED --- - Inherited constructor with dependent base class introduced by a typedef-name may not work"
href="https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27504">bug 27504</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:frankhb1989@gmail.com" title="frankhb1989@gmail.com">frankhb1989@gmail.com</a>
</span></b>
<pre>This is still strange following the assumptions on the resolution. How does the
existence of default template argument in the base interact with the
using-declaration?
If `S<int> x;` is deleted, it also does not trigger any diagnostic. Does this
work as intended?
Moreover, will Clang++ preserve the behavior in old standard mode? (I read CWG
2070 as an "enhancement" to the standard.)
The diagnostic here is also confusing. Is it intended?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>