<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://llvm.org/bugs/" />
    </head>
    <body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:wenzel.jakob@epfl.ch" title="Wenzel Jakob <wenzel.jakob@epfl.ch>"> <span class="fn">Wenzel Jakob</span></a>
</span> changed
              <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED INVALID - AVX512: Support passing ZMM vectors via registers (via __regcall or other calling convention)"
   href="https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28963">bug 28963</a>
        <br>
             <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
          <tr>
            <th>What</th>
            <th>Removed</th>
            <th>Added</th>
          </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
           <td>REOPENED
           </td>
           <td>RESOLVED
           </td>
         </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
           <td>---
           </td>
           <td>INVALID
           </td>
         </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED INVALID - AVX512: Support passing ZMM vectors via registers (via __regcall or other calling convention)"
   href="https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28963#c4">Comment # 4</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED INVALID - AVX512: Support passing ZMM vectors via registers (via __regcall or other calling convention)"
   href="https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28963">bug 28963</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:wenzel.jakob@epfl.ch" title="Wenzel Jakob <wenzel.jakob@epfl.ch>"> <span class="fn">Wenzel Jakob</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=28963#c3">comment #3</a>)
<span class="quote">> > 1. GCC does this by default, even without specifying specific calling
> > conventions. (!). This is ideal from a performance perspective albeit
> > perhaps a bit unorthodox.

> This is a serious compatibility problem, it means that we aren't doing the
> right thing.  Please file a bug showing clang performing a parameter access
> via an inappropriate register (while showing what GCC does).</span >

That's a good point -- thank you for clarifying. I've opened another ticket
about that (<a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW --- - ABI incompatibilities between Clang and GCC (calling conventions for AVX512 vector arguments)"
   href="show_bug.cgi?id=28975">Bug 28975</a>) and will close this ticket then.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>
      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
      
      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>