<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://llvm.org/bugs/" />
    </head>
    <body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:nlewycky@google.com" title="Nick Lewycky <nlewycky@google.com>"> <span class="fn">Nick Lewycky</span></a>
</span> changed
              <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - Clang doesn't emit tautological-compare warning when nonnull is compared against NULL"
   href="https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13956">bug 13956</a>
        <br>
             <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
          <tr>
            <th>What</th>
            <th>Removed</th>
            <th>Added</th>
          </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
           <td>NEW
           </td>
           <td>RESOLVED
           </td>
         </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
           <td>---
           </td>
           <td>FIXED
           </td>
         </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - Clang doesn't emit tautological-compare warning when nonnull is compared against NULL"
   href="https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13956#c2">Comment # 2</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - Clang doesn't emit tautological-compare warning when nonnull is compared against NULL"
   href="https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13956">bug 13956</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:nlewycky@google.com" title="Nick Lewycky <nlewycky@google.com>"> <span class="fn">Nick Lewycky</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre>Looking over old bugs, these appear to be fixed!

pr13956-1.cc:3:12: warning: comparison of nonnull parameter 'x' equal to a null
      pointer is 'false' on first encounter [-Wtautological-pointer-compare]
    return x == NULL;
           ^    ~~~~

pr13956-2.cc:1:28: warning: reference cannot be bound to dereferenced null
      pointer in well-defined C++ code; comparison may be assumed to always
      evaluate to false [-Wtautological-undefined-compare]
bool foo(int &x) { return &x == 0; }
                           ^    ~

The idea of __attribute__((nonnull(x))) or 'void f(__attribute__((nonnull)) int
*x);' will have to live elsewhere.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>
      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
      
      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>