<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://llvm.org/bugs/" />
    </head>
    <body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:charles_li@playstation.sony.com" title="Charles Li <charles_li@playstation.sony.com>"> <span class="fn">Charles Li</span></a>
</span> changed
              <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED INVALID - Self referential using declaration inside a derived class lack an accompanying Note in C++11"
   href="https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27742">bug 27742</a>
        <br>
             <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
          <tr>
            <th>What</th>
            <th>Removed</th>
            <th>Added</th>
          </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
           <td>NEW
           </td>
           <td>RESOLVED
           </td>
         </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
           <td>---
           </td>
           <td>INVALID
           </td>
         </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED INVALID - Self referential using declaration inside a derived class lack an accompanying Note in C++11"
   href="https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27742#c2">Comment # 2</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED INVALID - Self referential using declaration inside a derived class lack an accompanying Note in C++11"
   href="https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27742">bug 27742</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:charles_li@playstation.sony.com" title="Charles Li <charles_li@playstation.sony.com>"> <span class="fn">Charles Li</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=27742#c1">comment #1</a>)
<span class="quote">> This is actually correct; C++98 and C++11 have different rules here.

> In C++98, the rule is that a declaration named by a using-declaration has to
> resolve to a member of a base class, so we first look up what C::bar means,
> and then diagnose because it's a member of our own class, C.

> In C++11, the rule is that the nested-name-specifier ("C::") must name a
> base class, so in that case we reject it without ever looking up what
> "C::bar" might name.</span >

Thank you. 

I will Resolve this bug as Invalid.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>
      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
      
      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>