<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://llvm.org/bugs/" />
    </head>
    <body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
        <tr>
          <th>Bug ID</th>
          <td><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW --- - no matching conversion for functional-style cast from 'void' to 'X'"
   href="https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25619">25619</a>
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Summary</th>
          <td>no matching conversion for functional-style cast from 'void' to 'X'
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Product</th>
          <td>clang
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Version</th>
          <td>3.5
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Hardware</th>
          <td>PC
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>OS</th>
          <td>Linux
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Status</th>
          <td>NEW
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Severity</th>
          <td>normal
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Priority</th>
          <td>P
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Component</th>
          <td>C++
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Assignee</th>
          <td>unassignedclangbugs@nondot.org
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Reporter</th>
          <td>matthew@dempsky.org
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>CC</th>
          <td>dgregor@apple.com, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Classification</th>
          <td>Unclassified
          </td>
        </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
        <pre>G++ produces a better diagnostic here.  In particular, I don't understand why
clang++ is talking about 'void'.

$ cat x.cc
struct X {
  explicit X(int, int, int);
};

void F() {
  X({1, 2, 3});
}

$ g++-4.8 -c x.cc -std=c++11
x.cc: In function ‘void F()’:
x.cc:6:14: error: converting to ‘X’ from initializer list would use explicit
constructor ‘X::X(int, int, int)’
   X({1, 2, 3});
              ^

$ clang++-3.5 -c x.cc -std=c++11
x.cc:6:3: error: no matching conversion for functional-style cast from 'void'
to 'X'
  X({1, 2, 3});
  ^~~~~~~~~~~
x.cc:1:8: note: candidate constructor (the implicit copy constructor) not
viable: cannot convert initializer list
      argument to 'const X'
struct X {
       ^
x.cc:1:8: note: candidate constructor (the implicit move constructor) not
viable: cannot convert initializer list
      argument to 'X'
struct X {
       ^
x.cc:2:12: note: candidate constructor not viable: requires 3 arguments, but 1
was provided
  explicit X(int, int, int);
           ^
1 error generated.

$ clang++-3.5 --version
Ubuntu clang version 3.5.0-4ubuntu2~trusty2 (tags/RELEASE_350/final) (based on
LLVM 3.5.0)
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix</pre>
        </div>
      </p>
      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
      
      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>