<html>

    <head>

      <base href="https://llvm.org/bugs/" />

    </head>

    <body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:todd.fiala@gmail.com" title="Todd Fiala <todd.fiala@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Todd Fiala</span></a>

</span> changed

              <a class="bz_bug_link 

          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"

   title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - test runner timeout does not work properly when inferior itself spawns children and shares file handles"

   href="https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25002">bug 25002</a>

        <br>

             <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">

          <tr>

            <th>What</th>

            <th>Removed</th>

            <th>Added</th>

          </tr>

         <tr>

           <td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>

           <td>ASSIGNED

           </td>

           <td>RESOLVED

           </td>

         </tr>

         <tr>

           <td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>

           <td>---

           </td>

           <td>WONTFIX

           </td>

         </tr></table>

      <p>

        <div>

            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 

          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"

   title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - test runner timeout does not work properly when inferior itself spawns children and shares file handles"

   href="https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25002#c3">Comment # 3</a>

              on <a class="bz_bug_link 

          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"

   title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - test runner timeout does not work properly when inferior itself spawns children and shares file handles"

   href="https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25002">bug 25002</a>

              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:todd.fiala@gmail.com" title="Todd Fiala <todd.fiala@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Todd Fiala</span></a>

</span></b>

        <pre>Getting this right causes some fair complication to the test runner logic.  I

think it is more fair to say:

If your test process (P1) creates new child processes (C1..CN), and you share

out your stdout/stderr to them, your test should expect to time out if you

don't ensure that  children C1..CN are cleaned up before P1 exits.

That, after all, is bad behavior.  I'm fine with our test system catching that

and flagging as a timeout.</pre>

        </div>

      </p>

      <hr>

      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>

          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>

      </ul>

    </body>

</html>