<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://llvm.org/bugs/" />
    </head>
    <body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
        <tr>
          <th>Bug ID</th>
          <td><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW --- - clang does not reject ambiguous function call"
   href="https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24767">24767</a>
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Summary</th>
          <td>clang does not reject ambiguous function call
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Product</th>
          <td>clang
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Version</th>
          <td>3.5
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Hardware</th>
          <td>PC
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>OS</th>
          <td>Linux
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Status</th>
          <td>NEW
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Severity</th>
          <td>normal
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Priority</th>
          <td>P
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Component</th>
          <td>C++
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Assignee</th>
          <td>unassignedclangbugs@nondot.org
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Reporter</th>
          <td>dimanne@ya.ru
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>CC</th>
          <td>dgregor@apple.com, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Classification</th>
          <td>Unclassified
          </td>
        </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
        <pre>clang compiles well following code (since clang 3.5), but should NOT according
to standard (<a href="http://pastebin.com/aVVbjw7A">http://pastebin.com/aVVbjw7A</a>). Also see this thread
<a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/29661253/overloaded-lambdas-in-c-and-differences-between-clang-and-gcc">http://stackoverflow.com/questions/29661253/overloaded-lambdas-in-c-and-differences-between-clang-and-gcc</a>


#include <utility>

template <class... Ts>
class TMultiLambda: public Ts... {
public:
    template <class... Fs>
    TMultiLambda(Fs&&... Vs) noexcept: Ts(std::forward<Fs>(Vs))... {
    }
};
template <class... Ts>
auto MakeMultiLambda(Ts&&... Vs) noexcept ->
TMultiLambda<std::remove_reference_t<Ts>...> {
    return { std::forward<Ts>(Vs)... };
}

int main() {
    int x;
    auto a = [x](int, int) { };
    auto b = [x] (char) { };
    auto c = MakeMultiLambda(a, b);
    c(2, 2);
    c('q');
    return 0;
}


P.S.
It seems you differently handle/treat methods and operator(). If operator()
change to function f() clang stops compiling this code.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>
      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
      
      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>