<html>
<head>
<base href="https://llvm.org/bugs/" />
</head>
<body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>Bug ID</th>
<td><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - cv-qualifiers not ignored on function type"
href="https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23546">23546</a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Summary</th>
<td>cv-qualifiers not ignored on function type
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Product</th>
<td>clang
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Version</th>
<td>3.6
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Hardware</th>
<td>PC
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>OS</th>
<td>All
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Status</th>
<td>NEW
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Severity</th>
<td>normal
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Priority</th>
<td>P
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Component</th>
<td>C++11
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Assignee</th>
<td>unassignedclangbugs@nondot.org
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Reporter</th>
<td>david_work@me.com
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>CC</th>
<td>dgregor@apple.com, llvmbugs@cs.uiuc.edu
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Classification</th>
<td>Unclassified
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<pre>[dcl.fct] ยง8.3.5/7 says,
"The effect of a cv-qualifier-seq in a function declarator is not the same as
adding cv-qualification on top of the function type. In the latter case, the
cv-qualifiers are ignored."
The last sentence doesn't seem to be implemented. The test below is
well-formed, but generates various errors including a warning, "qualifier on
function type 't' (aka 'void ()') has unspecified behavior."
Johannes Schaub says that this is a C++11 feature. Perhaps it should be
contingent on the language flag.
typedef void t();
void f();
t const f;</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>