<html>
    <head>
      <base href="http://llvm.org/bugs/" />
    </head>
    <body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
        <tr>
          <th>Bug ID</th>
          <td><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW --- - By-copy capture-default causes "const" unless "mutable" despite non-odr-use"
   href="http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22604">22604</a>
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Summary</th>
          <td>By-copy capture-default causes "const" unless "mutable" despite non-odr-use
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Product</th>
          <td>clang
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Version</th>
          <td>trunk
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Hardware</th>
          <td>All
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>OS</th>
          <td>All
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Status</th>
          <td>NEW
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Severity</th>
          <td>normal
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Priority</th>
          <td>P
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Component</th>
          <td>C++14
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Assignee</th>
          <td>unassignedclangbugs@nondot.org
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Reporter</th>
          <td>hstong@ca.ibm.com
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>CC</th>
          <td>llvmbugs@cs.uiuc.edu
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Classification</th>
          <td>Unclassified
          </td>
        </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
        <pre>In the following, it is observed that (consistent with the resolution to
DR1472) the appearance of "ref" in the lambda did not cause the creation of a
corresponding member of the closure type since there is no complaint from Clang
about the deleted copy constructor.

Since said appearance of "ref" does not refer to a member of the closure type,
it appears that Clang wrong in its complaining about "const" in the output
below. At the same time, adding "mutable" to the lambda-declarator should not
make a difference, but it does with Clang.

### SOURCE (<stdin>):
struct A {
   A() = default;
   A(const A &) = delete;
} globalA;

int main() {
   A &ref = globalA, *bar(A &);
   [=]() { bar(ref); };
}


### COMPILER INVOCATION:
clang -cc1 -Wno-unused-value -std=c++11 -x c++ -


### ACTUAL OUTPUT:
<stdin>:8:16: error: binding of reference to type 'A' to a value of type 'const
A' drops qualifiers
   [=]() { bar(ref); };
               ^~~
<stdin>:7:30: note: passing argument to parameter here
   A &ref = globalA, *bar(A &);
                             ^
1 error generated.


### EXPECTED OUTPUT:
(Clean compile)


### COMPILER VERSION INFO:
clang version 3.7.0 (trunk 229397)
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
Found candidate GCC installation:
/usr/local/gcc-4.8.2/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.8.2
Selected GCC installation:
/usr/local/gcc-4.8.2/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.8.2
Candidate multilib: .;@m64
Selected multilib: .;@m64</pre>
        </div>
      </p>
      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
      
      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>