<html>
    <head>
      <base href="http://llvm.org/bugs/" />
    </head>
    <body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
        <tr>
          <th>Bug ID</th>
          <td><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW --- - Members of current instantiation should be non-dependent, but are mostly treated as dependent"
   href="http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22038">22038</a>
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Summary</th>
          <td>Members of current instantiation should be non-dependent, but are mostly treated as dependent
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Product</th>
          <td>clang
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Version</th>
          <td>trunk
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Hardware</th>
          <td>PC
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>OS</th>
          <td>Windows NT
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Status</th>
          <td>NEW
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Severity</th>
          <td>normal
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Priority</th>
          <td>P
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Component</th>
          <td>C++11
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Assignee</th>
          <td>unassignedclangbugs@nondot.org
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Reporter</th>
          <td>harald@gigawatt.nl
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>CC</th>
          <td>dgregor@apple.com, llvmbugs@cs.uiuc.edu
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Classification</th>
          <td>Unclassified
          </td>
        </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
        <pre>Consider this test program, which uses ADL to detect whether expressions are
treated as dependent or as non-dependent. Non-dependent expressions are looked
up at template definition time, so find the void f(const char *s, ...)
function. Dependent expressions are looked up at template instantiation time
with ADL, and find the void f(const char *s, S1) function.

    #include <cstdio>

    void f(const char *s, ...) { std::printf("%s: non-dependent\n", s); }

    struct S1 { };

    template <typename T>
    struct S2 {
      static S1 a;
      static S1 b() { return {}; }
      template <typename U>
      static U c() { return {}; }
      static void z() {
        f("S1()", S1());
        f("T()", T());
        f("a", a);
        f("b()", b());
        f("c<T>()", c<T>());
        f("c<S1>()", c<S1>());
        f("decltype(b())()", decltype(b())());
      }
    };

    void f(const char *s, S1) { std::printf("%s: dependent\n", s); }

    int main() {
      S2<S1>::z();
    }

The output with r223387
(<a href="http://llvm.org/builds/downloads/LLVM-3.6.0-r223387-win32.exe">http://llvm.org/builds/downloads/LLVM-3.6.0-r223387-win32.exe</a> from 5 December)
is:

    S1(): non-dependent
    T(): dependent
    a: non-dependent
    b(): non-dependent
    c<T>(): dependent
    c<S1>(): dependent
    decltype(b())(): dependent

Compilation flags used for testing: -std=c++11 -pedantic -Wall. No warnings or
errors are given.

The ones involving T are sanity checks: they're obviously dependent. All the
other ones should be non-dependent. The difference between b() and
decltype(b())() is particularly troubling to me: b() is treated as
non-dependent when used directly, and decltype(expr) is supposed to be
dependent if and only if expr is type-dependent, and T() is supposed to be
type-dependent if and only if T is dependent, yet decltype(b())() is treated as
dependent.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>
      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
      
      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>