<html>
    <head>
      <base href="http://llvm.org/bugs/" />
    </head>
    <body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:dcb314@hotmail.com" title="David Binderman <dcb314@hotmail.com>"> <span class="fn">David Binderman</span></a>
</span> changed
              <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_REOPENED "
   title="REOPENED --- - trunk/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SROA.cpp: 2 * init error ?"
   href="http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20590">bug 20590</a>
        <br>
             <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
          <tr>
            <th>What</th>
            <th>Removed</th>
            <th>Added</th>
          </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
           <td>RESOLVED
           </td>
           <td>REOPENED
           </td>
         </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
           <td>WONTFIX
           </td>
           <td>---
           </td>
         </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_REOPENED "
   title="REOPENED --- - trunk/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SROA.cpp: 2 * init error ?"
   href="http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20590#c2">Comment # 2</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_REOPENED "
   title="REOPENED --- - trunk/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SROA.cpp: 2 * init error ?"
   href="http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20590">bug 20590</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:dcb314@hotmail.com" title="David Binderman <dcb314@hotmail.com>"> <span class="fn">David Binderman</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre><span class="quote">>They're not initialized by itself, but with an argument of the same name. </span >

I don't think so. Please quote the relevant part of the C++
language standard that two mentions of variable S refer to two different 
objects.

Let's not forget that this kind of double naming is poor software engineering.

I'm thinking that a fix like

SliceBuilder(const DataLayout &DL, AllocaInst &AI, AllocaSlices & thatS)
      : PtrUseVisitor<SliceBuilder>(DL),
        AllocSize(DL.getTypeAllocSize(AI.getAllocatedType())), S(thatS) {}

would solve the problem.

<span class="quote">>This is a very common pattern in LLVM and harmless. </span >

Nope. I've just scanned all the trunk source code of LLVM
and this problem pattern only occurs in this file. Hence the bug report.

<span class="quote">>What checker did emit those warnings?</span >

cppcheck, available from sourceforge. Strongly recommended.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>
      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
      
      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>