<html>
    <head>
      <base href="http://llvm.org/bugs/" />
    </head>
    <body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
        <tr>
          <th>Bug ID</th>
          <td><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW --- - pointer_traits::__to_raw_pointer does not respect allocator requirements (for void operator->())"
   href="http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20518">20518</a>
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Summary</th>
          <td>pointer_traits::__to_raw_pointer does not respect allocator requirements (for void operator->())
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Product</th>
          <td>libc++
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Version</th>
          <td>unspecified
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Hardware</th>
          <td>All
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>OS</th>
          <td>All
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Status</th>
          <td>NEW
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Severity</th>
          <td>normal
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Priority</th>
          <td>P
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Component</th>
          <td>All Bugs
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Assignee</th>
          <td>unassignedclangbugs@nondot.org
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Reporter</th>
          <td>tkoeppe@google.com
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>CC</th>
          <td>llvmbugs@cs.uiuc.edu, mclow.lists@gmail.com
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Classification</th>
          <td>Unclassified
          </td>
        </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
        <pre>The allocator requirements say that X::pointer::operator-> only needs to work
for object pointers, not for X::void_pointer.

However, in libc++'s implementation of pointer_traits::__to_raw_pointer
(currently in memory:1051), operator->() is called regardless of the pointer
type. Thus this code does not compile if given a conforming fancy pointer whose
void specialization does not implement operator->.

(This is actually a plausible situation: A reasonable implementation would have
a base class that does not overload any accessor operators, and only provide
those implementations in non-void specializations of a derived class.)</pre>
        </div>
      </p>
      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
      
      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>