<html>
<head>
<base href="http://llvm.org/bugs/" />
</head>
<body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>Bug ID</th>
<td><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - libc++ has no minor or patch version, and no version symbols"
href="http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19817">19817</a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Summary</th>
<td>libc++ has no minor or patch version, and no version symbols
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Product</th>
<td>libc++
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Version</th>
<td>unspecified
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Hardware</th>
<td>PC
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>OS</th>
<td>Linux
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Status</th>
<td>NEW
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Severity</th>
<td>enhancement
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Priority</th>
<td>P
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Component</th>
<td>All Bugs
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Assignee</th>
<td>unassignedclangbugs@nondot.org
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Reporter</th>
<td>richardg.work@gmail.com
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>CC</th>
<td>llvmbugs@cs.uiuc.edu, mclow.lists@gmail.com
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Classification</th>
<td>Unclassified
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<pre>The libc++.so.1 library symlink points to libc++.so.1.0 for both llvm 3.3 and
3.4. However, these libraries contain different symbols. For example, I can see
std::__1::shared_mutex::lock is present in the llvm 3.4 libc++.so. This may
cause a problem for distributing binaries built on llvm 3.4 to a machine with
llvm 3.3 installed.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the libc++.so library should distinguish
these ambiguous libraries using patch versions, ie. create libc++.so.1.0.1, and
include version symbols similar to GLIBCXX_* symbols in the libstdc++.so
library.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>