<html>
    <head>
      <base href="http://llvm.org/bugs/" />
    </head>
    <body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
        <tr>
          <th>Bug ID</th>
          <td><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW --- - List initialization of placement parameter produces spurious complaint regarding deleted copy/move constructors"
   href="http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19729">19729</a>
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Summary</th>
          <td>List initialization of placement parameter produces spurious complaint regarding deleted copy/move constructors
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Product</th>
          <td>clang
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Version</th>
          <td>3.4
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Hardware</th>
          <td>Other
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>OS</th>
          <td>Linux
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Status</th>
          <td>NEW
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Severity</th>
          <td>normal
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Priority</th>
          <td>P
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Component</th>
          <td>C++11
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Assignee</th>
          <td>unassignedclangbugs@nondot.org
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Reporter</th>
          <td>hstong@ca.ibm.com
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>CC</th>
          <td>dgregor@apple.com, llvmbugs@cs.uiuc.edu
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Classification</th>
          <td>Unclassified
          </td>
        </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
        <pre>List initialization by constructor involves no copy/move operation on the
result of the constructor selected by overload resolution; however, when used
in the placement arguments of a new-expression, Clang apparently tries to
perform a copy.

GCC does not have an issue with the deleted copy and move constructors.

### SOURCE:> cat clangListInitNewPlacement.cc 
struct A {
   A(int);
   A(const A &) = delete;
   A(A &&) = delete;
   ~A();
};

struct B {
   static void *operator new(decltype(sizeof(0)), A);
   static void operator delete(void *, A);
};

void bar() {
   new ({0}) B;
}
Return:  0x00:0


### COMPILER INVOCATION AND OUTPUT:> clang++ -std=c++11
clangListInitNewPlacement.cc -c
clangListInitNewPlacement.cc:14:9: error: call to deleted constructor of 'A'
   new ({0}) B;
        ^~
clangListInitNewPlacement.cc:4:4: note: function has been explicitly marked
deleted here
   A(A &&) = delete;
   ^
clangListInitNewPlacement.cc:9:52: note: passing argument to parameter here
   static void *operator new(decltype(sizeof(0)), A);
                                                   ^
1 error generated.
Return:  0x01:1


### EXPECTED OUTPUT:
Clean compile.


### VERSION INFO:> clang++ -v
clang version 3.4 (tags/RELEASE_34/final)
Target: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
Found candidate GCC installation: /usr/lib/gcc/ppc64-redhat-linux/4.4.4
Found candidate GCC installation: /usr/lib/gcc/ppc64-redhat-linux/4.4.6
Selected GCC installation: /usr/lib/gcc/ppc64-redhat-linux/4.4.6
Return:  0x00:0</pre>
        </div>
      </p>
      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
      
      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>