<html>
<head>
<base href="http://llvm.org/bugs/" />
</head>
<body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>Bug ID</th>
<td><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - clang doesn't treat a typedef-name as a class-name when naming the destructor"
href="http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19620">19620</a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Summary</th>
<td>clang doesn't treat a typedef-name as a class-name when naming the destructor
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Product</th>
<td>clang
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Version</th>
<td>unspecified
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Hardware</th>
<td>PC
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>OS</th>
<td>All
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Status</th>
<td>NEW
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Severity</th>
<td>normal
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Priority</th>
<td>P
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Component</th>
<td>C++11
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Assignee</th>
<td>unassignedclangbugs@nondot.org
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Reporter</th>
<td>david.majnemer@gmail.com
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>CC</th>
<td>dgregor@apple.com, llvmbugs@cs.uiuc.edu
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Classification</th>
<td>Unclassified
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<pre>consider:
typedef struct T {} I;
typedef const I
CI;
void blah(I *a) {
a->CI::~I();
}
clang gives:
<stdin>:5:11: error: expected the class name after '~' to name a destructor
a->CI::~I();
^
9.1 [class.name]/5 states that a typedef-name may behave like a class-name once
it's qualifiers are ignored.
5.1.1 [expr.prim.general]/8 has the requirement that, when naming the
destructor, the two class-names must refer to the same class-name.
When keeping the above two rules in mind, there doesn't seem to be a rationale
for rejecting this code.
GCC, EDG and MSVC all accept.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>