<html>
    <head>
      <base href="http://llvm.org/bugs/" />
    </head>
    <body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk" title="Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">Richard Smith</span></a>
</span> changed
              <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - Should warn for "const" applied to reference type (even a typedef)"
   href="http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13110">bug 13110</a>
        <br>
             <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
          <tr>
            <th>What</th>
            <th>Removed</th>
            <th>Added</th>
          </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
           <td>NEW
           </td>
           <td>RESOLVED
           </td>
         </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">CC</td>
           <td>
                
           </td>
           <td>richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk
           </td>
         </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
           <td>---
           </td>
           <td>WONTFIX
           </td>
         </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - Should warn for "const" applied to reference type (even a typedef)"
   href="http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13110#c8">Comment # 8</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - Should warn for "const" applied to reference type (even a typedef)"
   href="http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13110">bug 13110</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk" title="Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">Richard Smith</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre>Generally-speaking, we don't like inventing language extensions, because they
create C++ dialects and so fragment the language. AFAIK, no other compiler
accepts 'T &const', so there's no compatibility argument here, and no-one is
proposing this for standardization.

I'm also not even sure what you're proposing: is it that you want 'T &const' to
be treated as 'T const&' (which I think is the "common newbie mistake" you're
referring to), or that you want it to be treated as 'T &' (like 'const
IntRef')? Both of these seem like bad answers.

This does not meet the requirements for a Clang language extension (see
<a href="http://clang.llvm.org/get_involved.html">http://clang.llvm.org/get_involved.html</a>) => WONTFIX.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>
      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
      
      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>