<html>
<head>
<base href="http://llvm.org/bugs/" />
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:hhinnant@apple.com" title="Howard Hinnant <hhinnant@apple.com>"> <span class="fn">Howard Hinnant</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - tuple constructor should be marked explicit"
href="http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15299">bug 15299</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
<td>NEW
</td>
<td>RESOLVED
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
<td>---
</td>
<td>WONTFIX
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - tuple constructor should be marked explicit"
href="http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15299#c5">Comment # 5</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - tuple constructor should be marked explicit"
href="http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15299">bug 15299</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:hhinnant@apple.com" title="Howard Hinnant <hhinnant@apple.com>"> <span class="fn">Howard Hinnant</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Closing. "Won't fix" isn't exactly the right resolution. I would have
preferred to mark this as "Extension". The extension is so popular I do not
see any way to back it out at this point. I am also unsure how to implement a
pedantic warning for the use of this extension.
Fortunately it isn't a huge porting impediment. If upon porting you discover
that you have unknowingly taken advantage of this extension, you get a compile
time error, not a run time error. And the C++11-conforming fix to get your
code portable is simple, and given by Gonzalo BG's 2013-02-19 comment.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>