<html>
    <head>
      <base href="http://llvm.org/bugs/" />
    </head>
    <body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
        <tr>
          <th>Bug ID</th>
          <td><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW --- - Deleted copy/assign considered "trivial" by __has_trivial_{copy,assign}"
   href="http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18185">18185</a>
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Summary</th>
          <td>Deleted copy/assign considered "trivial" by __has_trivial_{copy,assign}
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Product</th>
          <td>clang
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Version</th>
          <td>3.3
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Hardware</th>
          <td>PC
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>OS</th>
          <td>Linux
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Status</th>
          <td>NEW
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Severity</th>
          <td>normal
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Priority</th>
          <td>P
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Component</th>
          <td>C++11
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Assignee</th>
          <td>unassignedclangbugs@nondot.org
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Reporter</th>
          <td>temporal@gmail.com
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>CC</th>
          <td>dgregor@apple.com, llvmbugs@cs.uiuc.edu
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Classification</th>
          <td>Unclassified
          </td>
        </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
        <pre>Both static_asserts below fail on Clang but pass on GCC.

In my case, I incorrectly tried to copy a class with deleted copy and
assignment, but the code which actually performed the copy was a template that
used the type traits to decide when it could use memcpy instead as an
optimization.  So, instead of the expected compiler error I got silent memory
corruption.


struct S {
  S(const S&) = delete;
  S& operator=(const S&) = delete;
};

static_assert(!__has_trivial_copy(S),
    "Deleted copy constructor considered trivial.");
static_assert(!__has_trivial_assign(S),
    "Deleted operator= considered trivial.");</pre>
        </div>
      </p>
      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
      
      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>