<html>
    <head>
      <base href="http://llvm.org/bugs/" />
    </head>
    <body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:t.p.northover@gmail.com" title="Tim Northover <t.p.northover@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Tim Northover</span></a>
</span> changed
              <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - [ARM Backend]Rewinding to first LDR/VLDRD should use reverse_iterator when emitting epiloge"
   href="http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18136">bug 18136</a>
        <br>
             <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
          <tr>
            <th>What</th>
            <th>Removed</th>
            <th>Added</th>
          </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
           <td>NEW
           </td>
           <td>RESOLVED
           </td>
         </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
           <td>---
           </td>
           <td>FIXED
           </td>
         </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - [ARM Backend]Rewinding to first LDR/VLDRD should use reverse_iterator when emitting epiloge"
   href="http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18136#c3">Comment # 3</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - [ARM Backend]Rewinding to first LDR/VLDRD should use reverse_iterator when emitting epiloge"
   href="http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18136">bug 18136</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:t.p.northover@gmail.com" title="Tim Northover <t.p.northover@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Tim Northover</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre>Thanks for the test-case. I believe it's the fact that the VLDMIA_UPD is at the
beginning of the block that messes up the tracking rather than isCSRestore.

I actually think the entire idea of tracking FirstPop like that was misguided:
the folding *has* to happen precisely where we'd insert an sp-update to be
valid, which is the entire reason MBBI exists. We should just be using that.

This one should be fixed in r196493. I really hope it's the last.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>
      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
      
      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>