<html>
    <head>
      <base href="http://llvm.org/bugs/" />
    </head>
    <body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
        <tr>
          <th>Bug ID</th>
          <td><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW --- - multiple unsequenced modifications and initializer list"
   href="http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17893">17893</a>
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Summary</th>
          <td>multiple unsequenced modifications and initializer list
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Product</th>
          <td>clang
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Version</th>
          <td>3.3
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Hardware</th>
          <td>Macintosh
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>OS</th>
          <td>All
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Status</th>
          <td>NEW
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Severity</th>
          <td>normal
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Priority</th>
          <td>P
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Component</th>
          <td>C++
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Assignee</th>
          <td>unassignedclangbugs@nondot.org
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Reporter</th>
          <td>mail.pourri@laposte.net
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>CC</th>
          <td>dgregor@apple.com, llvmbugs@cs.uiuc.edu
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Classification</th>
          <td>Unclassified
          </td>
        </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
        <pre>The following code:

int count = 23;
int foo[] = { count++, count++, count++ };

Generates a: "warning: multiple unsequenced modifications to 'count'
[-Wunsequenced]"

This is incorrect, as I interpret the C++03 standard, as each initializer
expression in the above is a full-expression (1.9 [intro.execution]/12-13) and
therefore there is a sequence point after each expression (1.9
[intro.execution]/16).
It seems that the standard does not seem to dictate the order in which the
expressions are evaluated, which, as far as I know seems to be left to right in
all compilers I've tested.

BTW, in C++11, this is an allowed statement, and Clang actually silent the
warning by itself.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>
      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
      
      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>