<html>
    <head>
      <base href="http://llvm.org/bugs/" />
    </head>
    <body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
        <tr>
          <th>Bug ID</th>
          <td><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW --- - If an array element lifetime-extends a temporary, we destroy the objects in the wrong order"
   href="http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16476">16476</a>
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Summary</th>
          <td>If an array element lifetime-extends a temporary, we destroy the objects in the wrong order
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Product</th>
          <td>clang
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Version</th>
          <td>trunk
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Hardware</th>
          <td>PC
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>OS</th>
          <td>Linux
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Status</th>
          <td>NEW
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Severity</th>
          <td>normal
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Priority</th>
          <td>P
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Component</th>
          <td>C++
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Assignee</th>
          <td>unassignedclangbugs@nondot.org
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Reporter</th>
          <td>richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>CC</th>
          <td>dgregor@apple.com, llvmbugs@cs.uiuc.edu
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Classification</th>
          <td>Unclassified
          </td>
        </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
        <pre>Consider:

struct A { ~A(); };
struct B { const A &a; ~B(); };
void f() { B b[2] = { A(), A() }; }

The 'A' objects are lifetime-extended here. Since we are supposed to clean up
automatic objects in reverse construction order (and C++11 sequences list
initialization), we should call:

~B() for b[0]
~A() for b[0]'s temporary
~B() for b[1]
~A() for b[1]'s temporary

However, clang emits a cleanup for the B[2] array instead, and so destroys both
B objects before either A object.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>
      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
      
      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>