[llvm-bugs] [Bug 34068] New: [Modules TS] libc++ multiple symbol definitions

via llvm-bugs llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Fri Aug 4 11:12:03 PDT 2017


            Bug ID: 34068
           Summary: [Modules TS] libc++ multiple symbol definitions
           Product: clang
           Version: trunk
          Hardware: PC
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P
         Component: Modules
          Assignee: unassignedclangbugs at nondot.org
          Reporter: boris at codesynthesis.com
                CC: dgregor at apple.com, llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org

When trying to link two object files corresponding to two module implementation
units I get duplicate symbol errors like this:

libbutl/sha256.so.o:(.rodata+0x1a): multiple definition of
libbutl/base64.so.o:(.rodata+0x1a): first defined here
libbutl/sha256.so.o:(.rodata+0x18): multiple definition of
libbutl/base64.so.o:(.rodata+0x18): first defined here
libbutl/sha256.so.o:(.rodata+0x19): multiple definition of
libbutl/base64.so.o:(.rodata+0x19): first defined here
libbutl/sha256.so.o:(.rodata+0x1b): multiple definition of
libbutl/sha256.so.o:(.rodata+0x10): multiple definition of
libbutl/base64.so.o:(.rodata+0x10): first defined here
libbutl/sha256.so.o:(.rodata+0x8): multiple definition of
libbutl/base64.so.o:(.rodata+0x8): first defined here
libbutl/sha256.so.o:(.rodata+0x1): multiple definition of
libbutl/base64.so.o:(.rodata+0x1): first defined here
libbutl/sha256.so.o:(.rodata+0x0): multiple definition of
libbutl/base64.so.o:(.rodata+0x0): first defined here

Making a reproducer is quite tedious (modules are a real pain without good
build system support). But I could give a link to the sources as well as the
entire compilation log if that would be helpful.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20170804/0abf61fa/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the llvm-bugs mailing list