[llvm-bugs] [Bug 26515] New: Extra vector move after a poor choice of destination register for a commutative operation

via llvm-bugs llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Sun Feb 7 05:00:33 PST 2016


https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26515

            Bug ID: 26515
           Summary: Extra vector move after a poor choice of destination
                    register for a commutative operation
           Product: new-bugs
           Version: 3.7
          Hardware: PC
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Keywords: performance
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P
         Component: new bugs
          Assignee: unassignedbugs at nondot.org
          Reporter: peter at cordes.ca
                CC: llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
    Classification: Unclassified

Possible duplicate of https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15705.  It shows
the same thing in integer code with cmov.

float add_in_wrong_order(__m128 v) {
    __m128 shuf = _mm_movehl_ps(v, v);
    __m128 sums = _mm_add_ps(shuf, v);  // Using _ss doesn't help
    return        _mm_cvtss_f32(sums);
}

with clang 3.7.1 -xc -O3 -Wall -fverbose-asm -march=haswell -ffast-math
-mno-avx
compiles to (godbolt: http://goo.gl/sV9tMR)

        # (see the end of this post for a suggested optimal sequence)
        movaps  xmm1, xmm0
        movhlps xmm1, xmm1         # with add_ss, this is shufpd x1,x1, 1
        addps   xmm1, xmm0
        movaps  xmm0, xmm1         # should have just used addps xmm0, xmm1

I've seen this failure to generate the result in the desired register before in
clang output, but didn't get around to reporting it.  I forget if I've seen
this with integer registers, or just with non-AVX vectors.

---

Would it be possible for LLVM to see that _mm_cvtss_f32 is only taking the low
element, and propagate that back to the inputs to add_ps?  Probably not, since
you still need to potentially fault on a signalling NaN in elements 1..3 if the
MXCSR has that enabled.  Still, doesn't -ffast-math mean you *don't* have to
care what happens to NaNs?

--------

As long as you don't cause slowdowns from doing FP calcs on garbage data,
-ffast-math lets you do a lot.  I think this sequence would be valid for that
source, with -ffast-math:

     movhlps    xmm1, xmm0   # upper half is garbage
     addss      xmm0, xmm1   # so don't use it

There's a false dependency on the old contents of xmm1.  When inlined, you can
use any long-dead register, or better: one that had to be ready at some point
before v was ready.

gcc likes to xor-zero registers to avoid false dependencies (e.g. for popcnt if
it doesn't want to overwrite the src).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20160207/d38330e6/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-bugs mailing list