[LLVMbugs] [Bug 21787] __has_trivial_constructor is true for lambdas

bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
Tue Dec 9 10:53:02 PST 2014


Richard Smith <richard-llvm at metafoo.co.uk> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |richard-llvm at metafoo.co.uk
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #1 from Richard Smith <richard-llvm at metafoo.co.uk> ---
You shouldn't be calling __has_trivial_constructor; it's an implementation
detail for use by the standard library. And even then, it should not be used
because it's mostly meaningless; __is_trivially_constructible should be used

Also, just because the default constructor is deleted, that doesn't make it
non-trivial. Note that both GCC and Clang accept this:

  struct S { S() = delete; };
  static_assert(__has_trivial_constructor(S), "");

Since GCC rejects the corresponding case with a lambda, for which the default
constructor is supposed to be defined as in the above example, this seems to be
a GCC bug.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20141209/2017ce21/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-bugs mailing list