[LLVMbugs] [Bug 19486] Initialising member in class definition works differently for incomplete type.

bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
Fri Apr 18 20:08:25 PDT 2014


Richard Smith <richard-llvm at metafoo.co.uk> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |richard-llvm at metafoo.co.uk
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #1 from Richard Smith <richard-llvm at metafoo.co.uk> ---
That's correct behavior, I'm afraid. The initializer is required to be
semantically valid when we get to the end of the class, not just when we get to
a constructor that uses it.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20140419/7c0af387/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-bugs mailing list