[LLVMbugs] [Bug 3500] Wrong type computed for member access to unsigned bitfield

bugzilla-daemon at cs.uiuc.edu bugzilla-daemon at cs.uiuc.edu
Fri May 1 17:33:44 PDT 2009


Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |

--- Comment #5 from Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com>  2009-05-01 19:33:43 ---
Thanks, Eli! Re-opening until I get *all* of the cases. 

The (x.x+=1)+1 case is interesting, and it makes me wonder: how hard are we
supposed to try to determine whether an expression is a bit-field? We currently
look through parentheses and implicit casts, but appears that we also have to
look into binary operators that are assignments, too. Now I'm worried about,
e.g., "true? x.x : 0".

Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

More information about the llvm-bugs mailing list