<div dir="ltr">Great work.  Have you tried (or considered) setting up an LLDB buildbot that runs the LLDB test suite with all of the sanitizers turned on?</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 5:39 AM Kamil Rytarowski via lldb-dev <<a href="mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org">lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I've finished the interruption for LLVM Sanitizers:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/the_llvm_sanitizers_stage_accomplished" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/the_llvm_sanitizers_stage_accomplished</a><br>
<br>
<br>
Plan for the next milestone:<br>
<br>
Keep upstreaming a pile of local compiler-rt patches.<br>
Restore the LLDB support for traced programs with a single thread.<br>
<br>
<br>
This work was sponsored by <The NetBSD Foundation>.<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
lldb-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div>