<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Feb 21, 2017, at 5:08 PM, Jim Ingham <<a href="mailto:jingham@apple.com" class="">jingham@apple.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><blockquote type="cite" style="font-family: Menlo-Regular; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class=""><br class="Apple-interchange-newline">On Feb 21, 2017, at 4:49 PM, Jim Ingham via lldb-dev <<a href="mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org" class="">lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">On Feb 21, 2017, at 4:24 PM, Greg Clayton via lldb-dev <<a href="mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org" class="">lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">- StepOverBreakpointTestCase: Have the test not store the breakpoints<br class="">in the test case object. Basically, declare that this is not a bug,<br class="">and it's the users responsibility to clean up necessary objects.<br class=""></blockquote><br class="">It would be nice to avoid this.<br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><br class=""></blockquote></blockquote><br class="">I don't agree with this. I think trying to force folks using the API from Python to manually clear all stored objects would be really obnoxious. If anything, we should figure out how to make this accidental failure into an intended failure so we can make sure we don't end up requiring this kind of micro-management.<br class=""></blockquote><br style="font-family: Menlo-Regular; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class=""><span style="font-family: Menlo-Regular; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; display: inline !important;" class="">It's possible you meant "it would be nice to avoid it's being the user's responsibility to clean up necessary objects", in which case sorry for mis-reading but happy we agree...</span><br style="font-family: Menlo-Regular; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Yep, that is what I meant. No one should have to worry about cleansing any variables. It should just work. So we need to pick the lldb::SB objects that have strong reference very carefully.</div></body></html>