Should we consider adding git hyper-blame to llvm and recommending its usage?<br><br><a href="https://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/chrome-infra-docs/flat/depot_tools/docs/html/git-hyper-blame.html">https://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/chrome-infra-docs/flat/depot_tools/docs/html/git-hyper-blame.html</a><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 6:44 AM Ed Maste via lldb-dev <<a href="mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org">lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On 19 August 2016 at 17:10, Kate Stone via lldb-dev<br>
<<a href="mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Sept 5th Trunk closes for commits while reformatting takes place and is<br>
> validated before re-opening trunk.<br>
<br>
This is fine with me.<br>
<br>
As for validation, from my perspective I want to make sure the FreeBSD<br>
build-only buildbot is green:<br>
<a href="http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-amd64-ninja-freebsd11" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-amd64-ninja-freebsd11</a><br>
and I will build and run the test suite locally.<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
lldb-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div>