<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 at 22:03 Vince Harron <<a href="mailto:vince@nethacker.com">vince@nethacker.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir="ltr">Hi Andrew,</p>
<p dir="ltr">Thanks for the patch and thanks for your patience. The release is in 4-6 weeks but there are a lot of people on the team, someone will probably have a chance to look sooner.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Is there a deadline you are working against?</p></blockquote><div>No particular deadline. My ultimate goal is to get llgo (Go frontend for LLVM) packaged in Debian and Ubuntu. llgo only has CMake, and I don't want to maintain both CMake and autotools. Packaging is meant to be moving to CMake anyway, so I'm seeing what I can do to help move that forward. I'd like to have the LLVM changes done by the 3.7 release if possible.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Andrew</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<p dir="ltr">Vince<br>
</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Jun 1, 2015 1:16 AM, "Andrew Wilkins" <<a href="mailto:axwalk@gmail.com" target="_blank">axwalk@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 at 16:01 Sylvestre Ledru <<a href="mailto:sylvestre@debian.org" target="_blank">sylvestre@debian.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div>Le 01/06/2015 09:55, Andrew Wilkins a
écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr">On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 at 11:06 Vince Harron <<a href="mailto:vince@nethacker.com" target="_blank"></a><a href="mailto:vince@nethacker.com" target="_blank">vince@nethacker.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">Hi Andrew,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>We're not testing that configuration so I'm not
surprised that you're hitting problems. I'd like to
look into it but we're working towards a release now and
this isn't the most critical issue. For today, I
recommend building without this flag.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>No worries. When would be a good time to ping back? I was
hoping to get the packaging updated for 3.7, but that may be
too aggressive, and not leave enough time for bug fixing.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Also, in case I wasn't clear: I have changes ready, I
just thought it might be polite to bring it up here first,
since I've not contributed before. Building without the flag
isn't really an option for Debian packaging. The
autotools-based build already links LLDB libs against
libLLVM.so, and it would be best to preserve that.</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></div><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Yep, I confirm that it is needed to move the Debian & Ubuntu
packages from autotools to cmake.<br>
For now, I have an important number of undefined symbols.<br>
Could you send your patch? I would be happy to test that.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Sure, I've just uploaded it to Phabricator: <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__reviews.llvm.org_D10157&d=AwMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=DDUMf06MYELAe1Nlv7KChiwJLLHbYha4jtK_AOiWqwQ&m=UKIvtCrGoOVdNtdFwQnS8ENuQ66vyGHZQXcQ-vDKOLg&s=yCe9qyMWssvzgxg9tn8m4My7RnwkxS8kz6h1efwbvwA&e=" target="_blank">http://reviews.llvm.org/D10157</a>.</div><div><br></div><div>Vince, please feel free to ignore that one for now, as you're busy. I don't want to disrupt anyone's work.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Andrew</div></div></div>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div></div>