<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dev@xenonium.com" target="_blank">dev@xenonium.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
Le 4 mars 2014 à 22:48, <a href="mailto:jingham@apple.com">jingham@apple.com</a> a écrit :<br>
<div class=""><br>
> No, nothing has changed. lldb only operates in "control other process" mode, not in "observe other process" mode, and controlling yourself is a neat trick you might be able to manage, but would add a lot of complexity for no clear benefit for most of the usages of lldb.<br>
><br>
> On OSX, you can use CoreSymbolication to take a backtrace of yourself. There are likely similar facilities on other systems.<br>
<br>
</div>That would be great but CoreSymbolication is a private undocumented framework from a third party developer point of view ;-)<br>
<br>
That said, OS X provide a couple of functions to get backtrace. see 'man backtrace' for details.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>backtrace/backtrace_symbols /atos(osx)/addr2line(linux) is not a viable alternative, as it doesn't give proper/accurate line numbers in many cases, unlike what lldb provides.</div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div></div></div></div>