[lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [lit] check-all hanging

Adrian Prantl via lldb-dev lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jan 3 14:47:59 PST 2019



> On Jan 3, 2019, at 8:30 AM, Frédéric Riss <friss at apple.com> wrote:
> 
> -llvm-dev + lldb-dev for the lldv test failures.
> 
>> On Jan 3, 2019, at 7:33 AM, Joel E. Denny <jdenny.ornl at gmail.com <mailto:jdenny.ornl at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>>   Expected Passes    : 57489
>>   Expected Failures  : 276
>>   Unsupported Tests  : 1883
>>   Unexpected Passes  : 2
>>   Unexpected Failures: 54
>> 
>> 14 warning(s) in tests.
>> FAILED: CMakeFiles/check-all
>> ```
>> 
>> I immediately ran it again and saw one new unexpected fail:
>> 
>> ```
>>     lldb-Suite :: tools/lldb-mi/syntax/TestMiSyntax.py
>> ```
> 
> Adrian, do we have remaining flakiness in the MI tests? Is this one of the GSoc tests?

That particular test still uses pexpect and needs to be rewritten as a LIT-based test; so, yes.

-- adrian
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20190103/0c0aab49/attachment.html>


More information about the lldb-dev mailing list