[lldb-dev] clang::VersionTuple

Zachary Turner via lldb-dev lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
Tue May 8 11:06:21 PDT 2018


+davide, +aprantl for the Apple perspective.

On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 10:04 AM Greg Clayton <clayborg at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On May 8, 2018, at 9:47 AM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote:
>
> We don’t want the lowest levels of lldb to depend on clang. If this is
> useful we should move it from clang to llvm and use llvm::VersionTuple
>
>
> I agree, though this move will cause merging issues for many that have
> repositories that link against older llvm/clang. Doesn't affect me anymore,
> but Apple will be affected.
>
> Greg
>
> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 9:26 AM Greg Clayton via lldb-dev <
> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> No issues from me.
>>
>> > On May 8, 2018, at 9:11 AM, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev <
>> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > While moving Args around, I noticed that we have a bunch of
>> > functions/classes that pass/store version numbers as a triplet of
>> integers
>> > (e.g. Platform::GetOSVersion). I got halfway into creating a wrapper
>> class
>> > for that when I noticed clang::VersionTuple, which is pretty much what I
>> > wanted out of the box.
>> >
>> > Now there are small differences between this class, and what we have
>> now:
>> > it has an extra fourth "build" field, and it uses only 31 bits to
>> represent
>> >  the values. None of these seem to matter (particularly as we are
>> > converting our representation into this struct in some places) that
>> much,
>> > but before I go through the trouble of pulling this class into llvm
>> > (although technically possible, it seems wrong to pull a clang
>> dependency
>> > at such a low level), I wanted to make sure we are able to use it.
>> >
>> > Do you see any reason why we could not replace our version triplets with
>> > clang::VersionTuple ?
>> >
>> > cheers,
>> > pl
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > lldb-dev mailing list
>> > lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lldb-dev mailing list
>> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20180508/4e7a7d81/attachment.html>


More information about the lldb-dev mailing list