[lldb-dev] FileSpec and normalization questions
Greg Clayton via lldb-dev
lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Apr 19 11:14:28 PDT 2018
We currently have DWARF that has a DW_AT_comp_dir that is set to "./" followed by any number of extra '/' characters. I would like to have this path normalized as we parse the DWARF so we don't end up with line tables with a variety of ".//+" prefixes on each source file.
While looking to solve this issue, I took a look at the functionality that is in FileSpec right now. In:
void FileSpec::SetFile(llvm::StringRef pathname, bool resolve, PathSyntax syntax);
This function always calls a cheaper normalize function:
void Normalize(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char> &path, FileSpec::PathSyntax syntax);
This function does nothing for posix paths, but switches backward slashes to forward slashes.
We have a FileSpec function named FileSpec::GetNormalizedPath() which will do much more path normalization on a path by removing redundant "." and ".." and "//".
I can fix my DWARF issue in a few ways:
1 - fix FileSpec::SetFile() to still call ::Normalize() but have it do more work and have it normalize out the and redundant or relative path info
2 - call FileSpec::GetNormalizedPath() on each comp dir before using it to actually normalize it
The main question is: do we want paths floating around LLDB that aren't normalized? It seems like having a mixture of theses path will lead to issues in LLDB so I would vote for solution #1.
Also, looking at the tests for normalizing paths I found the following pairs of pre-normalized and post-normalization paths for posix:
Why wouldn't we reduce "//" to just "/" for posix? And why wouldn't we reduce "//net" to "/net"?
Also I found:
Do we prefer to not have "./foo" to stay as "./foo"? Seems like if users know that their debug info has line table entries that are "./foo/foo.c" that they might type this in:
(lldb) b ./foo/foo.c:12
But this will fail since it might not match the "foo/foo.c:12" that might result from path normalization. We don't normalize right now so it doesn't matter and things would match, but part of my fix is normalizing a path in the DWARF that is currently ".////////foo/foo.c" down to either "./foo/foo.c" or "foo/foo.c" so it will matter depending on what we decide here.
Any input would be appreciated.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the lldb-dev