[lldb-dev] Forcing lldb to refresh process state

[Vadim Chugunov via lldb-dev]

Yeah, this `bs` + `stepi` dance is the only workaround I found so far.

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Greg Clayton <clayborg at gmail.com> wrote:

> There is a standard for reverse stepping where the GDB remote protocol was
> extended to do the reverse stepping. See:
>
> https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Packets.html
>
> Look for "reverse" in the text. They added "bc" for reverse continue and
> "bs" for reverse step. We should be using these if possible.
>
>
> On Aug 23, 2017, at 10:00 AM, Ted Woodward <ted.woodward at codeaurora.org>
> wrote:
>
> Perhaps a manual packet that tells your remote server that the next “s”
> packet is a reverse step, then run the lldb command “si”.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20170823/be3da345/attachment.html>