[lldb-dev] Forcing lldb to refresh process state

[Vadim via lldb-dev]

I'm trying to reverse-step.  So I think I'd need to refresh all thread states?

> On Aug 18, 2017, at 4:50 PM, Jim Ingham <jingham at apple.com> wrote:
> 
> No, there hasn't been a need for this.  
> 
> What commands are you planning to send?  Or equivalently, how much state are you expecting to change?
> 
> Jim
> 
>> On Aug 18, 2017, at 4:36 PM, Vadim Chugunov via lldb-dev <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> Is there any way to force lldb to refresh it's internal record of debuggee process state (as if it had just received a stop event)?  I want to send a custom command to remote gdb process stub (via `process plugin packet send`).  This works, but if the command alters debuggee state, lldb won't know about it.
>> _______________________________________________
>> lldb-dev mailing list
>> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>