[lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] Git Move: GitHub+modules proposal
Tim Northover via lldb-dev
lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jun 29 21:14:25 PDT 2016
> That makes it fragile, and that’s why I disagree with your “90% done” assessment.
> What if the service behing the hook is down for a few days?
In the long-term view, a pretty trivial catch-up script ought to be
able to synthesize a sane history after any amount of down-time.
People could even run it locally for their bisecting needs if it was
that important to them.
In the short term, I don't think it's a critical enough service to
worry about, frankly. What we already have is hopelessly fragile:
right now when LLVM's server plays up it takes out absolutely
everything, in the proposed world it would take out this bisecting
convenience feature. Seems like a strict improvement to me.
> Who will maintain it?
I'm not the best scripter and I'd be happy to cede to someone else,
but I'd be willing if it meant we could make progress.
More information about the lldb-dev