[lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] [3.8 Release] We have branched
Renato Golin via lldb-dev
lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jan 20 07:32:39 PST 2016
How are things going? It's been 5 days and no word. I'm running the
tests now, just in case, but would be good to know that no one would
be committing to the release candidate 1 tree in the mean time.
On 15 January 2016 at 15:56, Daniel Sanders via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: hwennborg at google.com [mailto:hwennborg at google.com] On Behalf
>> Of Hans Wennborg
>> Sent: 15 January 2016 15:52
>> To: Daniel Sanders
>> Cc: llvm-dev; lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org; openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org; cfe-
>> dev at lists.llvm.org
>> Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] [3.8 Release] We have branched
>> Hi Daniel,
>> Thanks for trying out the branch :-)
>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 5:30 AM, Daniel Sanders
>> <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Hans,
>> > I tried the release branch last night and I'm having problems building it. The
>> problem is that test-suite is now building as part of the Phase builds
>> (because this project contains CMakeLists.txt's now) but cmake 3.0.2 (from
>> Debian Jessie) generates an invalid Makefile.
>> > The error is:
>> > CMakeFiles/test-suite.dir/build.make:112: *** target pattern contains
>> no '%'. Stop.
>> > CMakeFiles/Makefile2:199: recipe for target 'CMakeFiles/test-
>> suite.dir/all' failed
>> > And the referenced line of the generated makefile is:
>> > test-suite-stamps/test-suite-force-rebuild: /home/das-local/llvm-
>> > it looks like cmake isn't fully expanding its generator expressions.
>> > Looking at my logs, it looks like the test-suite used to configure in 3.6.2 but
>> didn't build as part of test-release.sh and then 3.7.0 stopped since we had
>> switched to cmake and there was no CMakeLists.txt.
>> > I've always run the test-suite as a separate step as described in
>> http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseProcess.html. Should we stop creating the
>> projects/test-suite symlink to get back to the behaviour from 3.7.0 or should
>> we do something else?
>> Yes, I made the script stop making the symlink in r257791 and merged
>> it to the branch. Did that not work for you, or were you at an earlier
> I'm at r257773 so it looks like I didn't pick up that change. I'll give it another try tonight.
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
More information about the lldb-dev