[lldb-dev] LLDB Evolution: Next Phase

Pavel Labath via lldb-dev lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Aug 24 01:24:11 PDT 2016

Sounds like a good idea. After the reformat, we can try it out and see
if it works well enough (I don't know how smart that thing is, but I
can imagine it could end up quite confused by all the line breaking
that clang-format will do). If it works, I will definitely use it.


On 23 August 2016 at 20:34, Zachary Turner via lldb-dev
<lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Pretty much, yea.
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 12:24 PM Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote:
>> On 23 August 2016 at 11:55, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Should we consider adding git hyper-blame to llvm and recommending its
>> > usage?
>> Nifty, I hadn't encountered git hyper-blame before. Thanks Zach.
>> If I understand correctly all we need to do is add a
>> `.git-blame-ignore-revs` file to the lldb root directory which lists
>> git revision IDs to ignore, correct? And that's something we'd do
>> after the reformatting commit goes in (and it would not affect any
>> tool other than git hyper-blame).  If so it sounds good to me.
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-dev mailing list
> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

More information about the lldb-dev mailing list